"Politics is too serious a matter to be left to politicians"
Charles De Gaulle
"Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build a bridge even where there is no river.
Nikita Khrushchev
Support Democracy - Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
A blog to give a voice to our concern about the continued erosion of our democratic processes not only within the House of Commons and within our electoral system but also throughout our society. Here you will find articles about the current problems within our parliamentary democracy, about actions both good and bad by our elected representatives, about possible solutions, opinions and debate about the state of democracy in Canada, and about our roles/responsibilities as democratic citizens. We invite your thoughtful and polite comments upon our posts and ask those who wish to post longer articles or share ideas on this subject to submit them for inclusion as a guest post.
Contact us at democracyunderfire@gmail.com
Contact us at democracyunderfire@gmail.com
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Australian Coalition Government?
Just 4 months after
England, the home of the parliamentary system that many commonwealth
countries governance is based upon, formed
a coalition government it looks like the same may happen in
Australia.
“With 74.7
percent of the vote counted on a two-party preferred basis, Labor and
the Liberal-National coalition were tied on 71 seats each in the
150-member House of Representatives, according to the Australian
Electoral Commission as of 8:35 a.m. Seventy-six seats in the lower
house are needed to form a government. The electorate also voted for
40 of the 76 seats in the upper house Senate.”
“At
the close of counting last night, the probable composition of the
upper chamber was 35 Coalition senators, 31 Labor senators, nine
Greens senators and independent Nick Xenophon.
The lower house will
take some time to decide but it is clear it will be a minority
government between the (conservative) coalition, labor party, greens
and that a coalition government with the greens is probable.”
It is interesting to
note that the Harper regime is in a minority position and yet there
is no coalition government in Canada. Is that due to Harpers
arrogance, the oppositions weakness or a total ignorance of how
coalitions work by both the Canadian public and our political
“leaders”. It is also clear that no matter when the next
election may come in Canada, and despite our antiquated electoral
system, it will be another minority government, whether or not
whoever receives the most seats (and thats not necessarily the most
votes) will seek to form a coalition or leave us forever on the brink
of an election due to political “games” in the House
remains to be seen.
Bottom line – As
citizens show their unhappiness with the traditional governing
partys, minority and coalition
governments are rapidly becoming the norm within countries with
various forms of parliamentary democracies. Canada is no different,
the choices may not be the same, the electoral system may influence
the results somewhat, many of our politicians may say they would not
consider forming a coalition, but the reality is that such
cooperative governance is coming to a country near you. And the
sooner the better from my point of view!
Sunday, August 15, 2010
A Long Hot Summer.
“A democracy
whose government refuses to heed the will of the majority as
routinely as it embraces the narrow interests of a vocal fringe is no
democracy at all; it is, by ambition and practice, an elected
oligarchy.
In the waning days of a
long, hot summer, Canada is coming perilously close to that which its
history, traditions and civic sensibilities utterly despise: a nation
ruled by a smug, self-satisfied coterie of partisan strong men whose
coarse manipulation of facts and rational argument supplants
intelligent debate and resists effective opposition.”
So says Alec
Bruce a Moncton-based journalist in his
column this week. Many of us have expressed this view
in recent time but few so eloquently, would that such words had come
from an opposition leader in a rousing speech but it would seem that
we have no great speakers or leaders, just self-serving political
flacks.
Alec goes on to say of
the Harper Regime “Their hard line, right-wing mentality has
extolled the virtue of certitude in all matters of state, as bias and
presumption have proscribed the meritorious, once meretricious,
qualifications for public office. Meanwhile, reasonable dissent has
become the province of eggheads, elitists and other assorted
traitors.”
Therein lays the whole
problem, we each may have a different view of what should be done, on
stimulus spending criteria, on various social support programs, on
foreign affairs, on immigration and on the collection of data by
government, this is normal. What is not normal is the manner in which
the Harper Regime goes about advancing its “agenda” with
a total disregard for parliamentary procedure and expert advice. Any
one who expresses an alternative view is dismissed as irrelevant or
wrong no matter their credentials. “Arms length” boards
and commissions are suddenly not so arms length, their members being
summarily replaced with those who will mindlessly repeat the spin and
talking points of the regime, scientists and civil servants are
silenced, all “information” must be PMO approved, control
must be maintained.
As our columnist says
reasonable dissent has become traitorous, something to be suppressed
or scorned. This is indeed the mark of an elected oligarchy. To
complete the transformation of Canada into a “country you wont
recognise” and ensure that the Canadian people will not have
the will or ability to remove this dictatorial, corrupt and
undemocratic regime from power they have but to give the public the
impression that their input is meaningless, that everything is just
fine and that their detractors are just blowing hot air. When that
fails the next best move is to eliminate public funding for
opposition partys whilst spending obscene amounts of public money on
self promotion and spin doctors, attack the impartiality of Elections
Canada and avoid at all cost any move that would modernise our
electoral system and encourage citizens to actually vote.
It seems to me that
they are well along this road and we have very few opportunities to
turn the bus around, that there are but a collection of mediocre
alternative drivers to choose from and that no-one can agree which one to
put behind the wheel makes us wish we could simply get off the bus,
but that is simply not possible. We are all in the same bus, its time
to wake up and look where we are going and DO something about it. The
question is what, perhaps the first thing we must do is fire the
current driver and his crew of “we will tell you anything to
keep you happy” tour guides!
As James
Travers puts it “This country has a problem. It
has a ruling party that twists the truth and an Official Opposition
that can’t, or won’t, straighten it out.”
“No party or
leader willingly commits political suicide. Instead, they lurk in the
shadows, weighing odds and waiting for a promising moment to strike.
Still, parties risk everything when what’s good for them is
seen to be more important than what’s good for the country.”
Monday, August 9, 2010
One to watch (updated)
On the “open and accountable”
file this report will be interesting reading, I suspect Mr Page and
his team are still having problems getting the real figures out of
the Harper Regime.
Hundreds of millions of federal
infrastructure dollars might not get out the door before the Harper
government's program deadline on its economic stimulus plan for the
projects next spring, says a new analysis by Parliament's budget
watchdog.
Kevin Page, the parliamentary
budget officer, said the assessment, to be released on Monday, is
based on recent figures from Infrastructure Canada regarding the
multibillion-dollar government programs in its stimulus package for
the economy.
Read more: http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Stimulus+money+door/3370869/story.html#ixzz0w0vr3AFP
One wonders what kind of accounting
practices the government uses to track such moneys COMMITED to these
projects that is not spent (leaving the municipalities to pick up the
shortfall), and where it will be spent. Another budget increase for
the Spin and Cover up Department (PMO) perhaps?
Support Democracy - Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
UPDATE:- The PBO report can be now
downloaded at :-
Several observers have noted that the
BPO has determined that there is a strong risk of 23% of approved
projects not being completed by the March 2011 deadline with a
resulting shortfall (if as the government has said they will not
honor their funding commitment beyond this date) of abt $290 million.
This could go as high as 46% and $500 million. The shocking thing
about this report is not so much the above as anyone with any
knowledge of large construction projects will tell you, unforeseen
problems do occur to delay completion dates. The hard part to swallow
is that the government does not seem to really know where and how all
the funds are being spent, (or if they do they are not telling Mr
Page) as shown in this bit from the PBO.
“The claims datasets the
PBO has received from Infrastructure Canada include data
inconsistencies that affect the relevance and accuracy of PBO
performance analysis. Coupled with the fact that a significant
number of projects have not yet submitted progress reports, it is
impossible to draw authoritative conclusions about the program
performance at this time. Parliamentary monitoring of program
performance would be better served by a more consistent reporting
regime, with appropriate incentives to ensure timely and accurate
progress reporting.”
AND
“All PBO analysis is
sourced from the datasets received from Infrastructure Canada, and
the PBO continues to find inconsistencies in the datasets.
The Percent Complete figure, for example, is based on the
judgement of the reporting proponent and has no clear definition,
standard or process to calculate its value. These data
inconsistencies impact negatively on the results and accuracy of
PBO analysis and does not allow for an authoritative assessment of
program performance. “
With the above in mind if we look at
the number of projects completed as of March 2010 we see that with
26% of projects “not reported” only abt $650 million of
the $4 billion has been “claimed” as of march 2010. We
can but hope that this summers construction season will see things
move forward more swiftly but where unforeseen circumstances delay
completion of these projects the government MUST NOT withdraw
committed funding and download the additional costs to municipalities
who are already overwhelmed with additional social assistance costs
from those whose employment insurance has long since run out. The
“recession” is NOT over for many of our citizens, but
that “data” will no doubt also be ignored or forgotten by
the PMO spin doctors.
Sunday, August 1, 2010
Time for Change
Recently I received an
email from one of the potential candidates running for the Green Party
nomination in our riding.
Here in part is what
she said…
I chose to put my name
forward as a nominee because I am most interested in increasing
political participation locally. The Green Party has done amazing
work but there's still a lot of people who didn't vote in the last
election. To make change happen we need people to feel engaged and be
excited about politics. (I know, I know. It's the summer time, people
have better things to do.) I'm interested in all of the positive ways
that we can help our community do better. The G20 and the way the
budget was passed make me angry too, but I don't think it's going to
inspire our non-voting neighbours to get to the polls when the time
comes. Anger fades with time.
So I'd like to hear from you: what is it that drew you to the Green Party? Do you have a "pet issue" you'd like more people to care about? In your wildest dreams when the Green Party has accomplished everything you hoped it would--what does the world look like? And more specifically: what does our region look like?
So I'd like to hear from you: what is it that drew you to the Green Party? Do you have a "pet issue" you'd like more people to care about? In your wildest dreams when the Green Party has accomplished everything you hoped it would--what does the world look like? And more specifically: what does our region look like?
Lets take a look at the
points she raises….
“To make change
happen we need people to feel engaged and be excited about politics.”
I’m not sure that
many of us will ever be “excited” about politics but we
sure need to be “engaged” if we are to turn this bus
around before it goes over the cliff, unfortunately I suspect the
current driver will bail out just before it crashes and burns!
“I'm interested
in all of the positive ways that we can help our community do
better.” and “I am most interested in increasing
political participation locally”
Here is where the GPC
strikes a cord with many rural residents, with their think local
ideas, if the local economy does well and the local supports are in
place then the whole country benefits. Government programs must be
customized to individual communities, one size does not fit all, made
in Ottawa solutions do not work for everyone across the country.
Additionally folks are tuning out in disgust from the top down style
of governance we have now. We that even follow the federal
shenanigans are very much a minority judging from some of the folks
who look at me blankly when I talk about the omnibus budget or the
value of accurate census data or any other of the arbitrary and
partisan decisions the Harper regime pushes through.
“Anger fades with
time.” Indeed it does, but all is not forgotten, at least not
by this writer and a number of others. The Proroguing fiascos (two in
two years), the overspending both before during and after (is it over
yet?) the “recession” , the self congratulationary
advertising on our dollar, and yes, the G20 mess and spending will
not fade from the memory of those who take note of those things. But
then how many either never took note in the first place or simply did
not care is the bigger question.
“Do you have a "pet issue" you'd like more people to
care about?”
I think you all know
ONE of my pet issues, I beat the subject to death here on a weekly
basis. Our Democracy is in deep trouble and under constant attack, we
must stand up and do everything we can to save the (admittedly
flawed) system we have, improve it and not let those who would run
our county as an autocracy get their way.
My other pet issue so
closely linked with the above is “open data” or if you
prefer the publishing of all public papers, contracts, expenditures
and decisions by government in a timely and easily accessible manner
BEFORE requested. Not only to our MPs and “arms length”
watchdogs but to the interested public, only then can we say that a
government is “open and accountable”. Remember that
promise?
“What is it that
drew you to the Green Party?”
Yes, I know, I DO try
to be non partisan on these pages but my dislike of the current lot
(and the seemingly powerless / useless opposition) has been showing
for some time so its time I “came out” and said I
currently support the Greens.
That said I should
answer the question.
Firstly both their
current leaders stand and the GPC’s stated position on
protecting our Parliamentary Democracy, any party that does not put
this front an center is not worthy of you vote, they are merely
using, or perhaps misusing the system to their own ends. You cannot
pretend to be representing the people unless you support and enhance
the system that (in theory at least) give them (the people) the power
to control their own destiny.
Secondly their valiant
efforts at doing just that within their own party, their efforts to
include all the members in decision making, and their publishing of
as much data as possible on line for the members to see and discuss.
Its not perfect, its still a work in progress and like most things
where large groups of people with a variety of views have input to an
organization, sometimes messy! That folks is democracy.
Thirdly whilst many
folks think they are just about “the environment” they
are far more than that, the party is evolving, yes there are
divisions between the political strategist and the tree huggers and
all those in-between, but that too is democracy. Read
the “Vision Green” document, you may find a few
things you disagree with (as you would with the “other”
party’s vision if they ever had one that they didn’t
change each year to suit the current political landscape) but you
will find that there is little there that you can really say is
truly wrong. Would that we could say the same of those currently
“representing” us in the HoC now.
You may tell me I am
wrong, that the Greens cannot / will not make a difference, that
democracy is not worth fighting for, or that the current lot is
greater than sliced bread, all of which I will disagree with, but
that too is democracy!
I vote for change and I
don’t mean Harpers “you wont recognize the country when I
am done” sort of change. Its time!
Support Democracy - Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)