“A democracy
whose government refuses to heed the will of the majority as
routinely as it embraces the narrow interests of a vocal fringe is no
democracy at all; it is, by ambition and practice, an elected
oligarchy.
In the waning days of a
long, hot summer, Canada is coming perilously close to that which its
history, traditions and civic sensibilities utterly despise: a nation
ruled by a smug, self-satisfied coterie of partisan strong men whose
coarse manipulation of facts and rational argument supplants
intelligent debate and resists effective opposition.”
So says Alec
Bruce a Moncton-based journalist in his
column this week. Many of us have expressed this view
in recent time but few so eloquently, would that such words had come
from an opposition leader in a rousing speech but it would seem that
we have no great speakers or leaders, just self-serving political
flacks.
Alec goes on to say of
the Harper Regime “Their hard line, right-wing mentality has
extolled the virtue of certitude in all matters of state, as bias and
presumption have proscribed the meritorious, once meretricious,
qualifications for public office. Meanwhile, reasonable dissent has
become the province of eggheads, elitists and other assorted
traitors.”
Therein lays the whole
problem, we each may have a different view of what should be done, on
stimulus spending criteria, on various social support programs, on
foreign affairs, on immigration and on the collection of data by
government, this is normal. What is not normal is the manner in which
the Harper Regime goes about advancing its “agenda” with
a total disregard for parliamentary procedure and expert advice. Any
one who expresses an alternative view is dismissed as irrelevant or
wrong no matter their credentials. “Arms length” boards
and commissions are suddenly not so arms length, their members being
summarily replaced with those who will mindlessly repeat the spin and
talking points of the regime, scientists and civil servants are
silenced, all “information” must be PMO approved, control
must be maintained.
As our columnist says
reasonable dissent has become traitorous, something to be suppressed
or scorned. This is indeed the mark of an elected oligarchy. To
complete the transformation of Canada into a “country you wont
recognise” and ensure that the Canadian people will not have
the will or ability to remove this dictatorial, corrupt and
undemocratic regime from power they have but to give the public the
impression that their input is meaningless, that everything is just
fine and that their detractors are just blowing hot air. When that
fails the next best move is to eliminate public funding for
opposition partys whilst spending obscene amounts of public money on
self promotion and spin doctors, attack the impartiality of Elections
Canada and avoid at all cost any move that would modernise our
electoral system and encourage citizens to actually vote.
It seems to me that
they are well along this road and we have very few opportunities to
turn the bus around, that there are but a collection of mediocre
alternative drivers to choose from and that no-one can agree which one to
put behind the wheel makes us wish we could simply get off the bus,
but that is simply not possible. We are all in the same bus, its time
to wake up and look where we are going and DO something about it. The
question is what, perhaps the first thing we must do is fire the
current driver and his crew of “we will tell you anything to
keep you happy” tour guides!
As James
Travers puts it “This country has a problem. It
has a ruling party that twists the truth and an Official Opposition
that can’t, or won’t, straighten it out.”
“No party or
leader willingly commits political suicide. Instead, they lurk in the
shadows, weighing odds and waiting for a promising moment to strike.
Still, parties risk everything when what’s good for them is
seen to be more important than what’s good for the country.”
1 comment:
I read the Travers column and agree completely with his assessment of the fecklessness that the Liberal Party has consistently demonstrated as it 'opposes' Harper's autocratic rule.
Each time that the prospect of an election emerges, Mr. Ignatieff ensures that not enough members of his party are in the House for their vote against the measure. The latest example was the budget omnibus bill which, because it was a budget bill, would have led to the fall of the Government had there been enough Liberals in the House for the vote.
At the time, Bob Rae said that the Senate was the better mechanism by which to amend the Bill; however, once a spokesman for the Conservatives said that sending back an amended version of the bill would lead to an election, the pattern repeated itself: some Liberal Senators were absent from the Red Chamber for the vote on the amendments, and thus it will go back to the House unaltered.
Until the Liberals can show that they actually stand for something other than the bald lust to return to power, I cannot support them.
Post a Comment