Excerpts from articles
I have recently read – no further comment required!
Elizabeth
May - While Canadian political culture is not steeped in
vitriol and hatred, the trend lines are not good. We are
allowing increased levels of incivility to creep into our culture.
Abuse, vilification of political opponents, is becoming increasingly
commonplace. The nastiness of anonymous postings on websites I
mentioned in my last blog. That new anti-social use of social
media is a large part of the problem, but it is not the full extent
of it. Mainstream media is turning nastier. Even before
the Sun Media TV channel gets to the airwaves, its “star”
players, people like Ezra Levant and Lorrie Goldstein, are bringing a
level of rude, boorish behaviour to Canadian radio and TV. Our
political discourse has dramatically worsened in the last five years.
The heckling and abuse in Question Period set such a low bar that
citizens turn away in disgust. Treating each other with respect
is a foundational aspect of a decent society. “To
disagree without being disagreeable” has long been a Canadian
way of discussing differences. We are losing that.
James
Travers - Identity has long been a Canadian crisis. Living
next door to an economic and cultural giant makes we-the-pygmies a
little nervous and a lot self-conscious.
Understandable as that entrenched uncertainty is,
it masks a more immediate challenge. If the 21st century is to belong
to Canada in ways the 20th never quite did, Canadians must abandon
the notion that they are merely clients of the state and assert their
rights as owners of the country.
The difference between
customer and proprietor is pivotal. Customers are content with the
timely delivery of pleasing goods and services. Proprietors must
safeguard the long-term stability, growth and competitiveness of the
enterprise................
Citizens content to be clients can shrug away
those concerns. Canadians who remember that they own the place can’t
afford to be so complacent.
Gloria
Galloway - The three independent federal watchdogs created
by the Conservative government operate largely behind the closed
doors of their own offices and, after one was exposed this fall for
having done little in three years, critics are asking questions about
the effectiveness of the other two.
The case of Integrity
Commissioner Christiane Ouimet, who investigated just seven of the
228 complaints from public-service whistleblowers she received during
her tenure, left many in Parliament questioning how the problems in
that office had gone unnoticed.................
Karen Shepherd, who was
hired to ensure that politicians are not being unduly influenced by
their well-connected friends, has never found anyone guilty of
breaking the rules in the year and a half that she has been
Commissioner of Lobbying.
And, in more than three
years as Ethics Commissioner, Mary Dawson has discovered just one
person, a Liberal MP, to have violated the Conflict of Interest Code.
At the same time, she has absolved cabinet ministers, Conservative
staff, a Conservative MP and the government itself of myriad alleged
indiscretions.
The Canadian Press - A new study
ranks Canada dead last in an international comparison of
freedom-of-information laws — a hard fall after many years
being judged a global model in openness. The study by a pair of
British academics looked at the effectiveness of
freedom-of-information laws in five parliamentary democracies:
Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, the United Kingdom and Canada.
Ms. Legault, whose office resolves complaints from
requesters, said while the study has methodological shortcomings,
just-published government statistics covering the 2009-2010 fiscal
year nevertheless support the finding that the regime is broken.
“We can use our own data, and come to the
conclusion that our system is in decline,” she said.
Only about 16 per cent of the 35,000 requests
filed last year resulted in the full disclosure of information,
compared with 40 per cent a decade ago, she noted. And delays in the
release of records continue to grow, with just 56 per cent of
requests completed in the legislated 30-day period last year,
compared with almost 70 per cent at the start of the decade. Ms.
Legault's office also suffers from a chronic lack of resources,
creating backlogs, while the law does not give her the power to order
the release of documents.
The Harper
Conservatives first came to power in 2006 on an explicit promise to
reform the Access to Information Act dramatically but have largely
failed to deliver after five years in power.
Government
of Canada - The Government of Canada currently makes a
significant amount of open data available through various
departmental websites. Fall 2010 will see the launch of a new portal
to provide one-stop access to federal data sets by providing a
“single-window” to government data. In addition to
providing a common “front door” to government data, a
searchable catalogue of available data, and one-touch data
downloading, it will also encourage users to develop applications
that re-use and combine government data to make it useful in new and
unanticipated ways, creating new value for Canadians. Canada is also
exploring the development of open data policies to regularise the
publication of open data across government. The Government of Canada
is also working on a strategy, with engagement and input from across
the public service, developing short and longer-term strategies to
fully incorporate Web 2.0 across the government.
In addition, Canada’s proactive
disclosure initiatives represent an ongoing contribution to open and
transparent government. These initiatives include the posting of
travel and hospitality expenses, government contracts, and grants and
contribution funding exceeding pre-set thresholds. Subsequent phases
will involve the alignment of proactive disclosure activities with
those of the Access to Information Act, which gives citizens the
right to access information in federal government records.
Eaves.ca
re the above - On the open data front, the bad is that the
portal has not launched. We are now definitely passed the fall of
2010 and, as for whatever reason, there is no Canadian federal open
data portal. This may mean that the policy (despite being announced
publicly in the above document) is in peril or that it is simply
delayed.......................
Possibly the heart stopping moment in this brief
comes in the last paragraph where the government talks about posting
travel and hospitality expenses. While these are often posted (such
as
here)
they are almost never published in machine readable format and so
have to be scrapped in order to be organized, mashed up or compared
to other departments. Worse still, these files are scattered across
literally hundreds of government websites and so are virtually
impossible to track down. This guy
has
done just that, but of course now he has the data, it
is more easily navigable but no more open then before. In addition,
it takes him weeks (if not months) to do it, something the government
could fix rather simply.
The government should be lauded for trying to make
this information public. But if this is their notion of proactive
disclosure and open data, then we are in for a bumpy, ugly ride.
