With the recent round
of 'advertising' by political partys and the character assassination
contained in many of them one has to wonder what, if anything they
have to do with our democratic process. When you add this
out-of-election-period spate of 'advertising' with the recent
statement from our ruling regime that they will once again seek to
discontinue the per vote funding that gives opposition partys, large
and small, a least a fighting chance of getting their message out to
the voters and countering the resources available to whatever party
is currently in power, then we must conclude damn little!
One must conclude that,
at least so far as the ruling regime is concerned, its all about
retaining power and demonising any that might challenge that, about
untruths and innuendo being more effective than truth and
information, about how money can buy or influence voting pasterns. At
this point the opposition must be congratulated for not sinking to
respond with personal attack ads but concentrating on policy however
I wonder if this is going to now be the norm....... a constant year
round barrage of political advertising by those partys that can
afford to pay for such unnecessary and partisan posturing.
The opposition does
have an excuse, they were after all 'attacked' plus it is their JOB
to hold the government to account and to point out flaws in
questionable legislation and spending. I do hope they continue to
take the high road as things escalate as they no doubt will.
It would seem that this
is all in preparation for yet another test of seeing who blinks first
as the budget is presented, Green
Party Leader Elizabeth May had this to say recently:-
“A Prime
Minister in a Minority government preparing a budget should be
meeting with Opposition leaders. The Finance minister should be doing
the rounds with opposition finance critics. Key stakeholders should
be getting a lot of time for their proposals to fight the deficit,
while continuing economic recovery and creating full-time,
well-paying jobs.
But collaboration and olive branches are not in Mr. Harper’s repertoire. Attack ads clearly are.........
Clearly Mr. Harper is in no mood to make Parliament work. These ads are the Parliamentary equivalent of a declaration of war............. Attack ads are anti-democratic by definition.
It turns out they are also anti-Canadian. Thanks to Toronto Star journalist Susan Delacourt’s blog "Ad standards" I read the plea from Advertising Standards Canada to political parties. “
But collaboration and olive branches are not in Mr. Harper’s repertoire. Attack ads clearly are.........
Clearly Mr. Harper is in no mood to make Parliament work. These ads are the Parliamentary equivalent of a declaration of war............. Attack ads are anti-democratic by definition.
It turns out they are also anti-Canadian. Thanks to Toronto Star journalist Susan Delacourt’s blog "Ad standards" I read the plea from Advertising Standards Canada to political parties. “
With this all in mind
perhaps any political advertisement should be required to show the
following disclaimer during the entire length of the broadcast or at
the bottom of every newspaper or on-line advertisement.
“Political
parties are exempt from “truth in advertising”
requirements of the Canadian Code of Advertising Standards. “
It seems that not only
can MPs get away with untruths and personal attacks in the HoC and be protected by
'parliamentary privileged' but the political partys can fabricate any
kind of fiction for their advertising with no repercussions, at least
so far as the broadcasting and advertising industry is concerned.
Hardly news, but hardly the sort of thing you would expect in a
'democratic' country either.
We cannot leave this
subject without pointing out one lie that is being recirculated in
some of these ads, that being that a coalition government is somehow
wrong, unconstitutional and a thing to be feared. I call BULLSHIT. I
will not repeat here the many arguments that show it is both a
legitimate form of governance or point to the many democracy's across
the world that have (or have had) a coalition government, I will
however say that I am disappointed that the opposition have so
strongly rejected the notion that such a cooperative government is
possible when we all know that if and when it become politically
advantageous to do so they will rapidly change their tune and seek to
form such an alliance.
Must we descend further
into a what can only be called a majority dictatorship from our
current minority dictatorship before our “representatives”
and the citizens who elect them wake up a realize that democracy is
far more precious than one particular ideology or another, and lies,
spin and personal attacks have no part in such a system.
Support Democracy - Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
1 comment:
No surprise the CPC is fear mongering over coalitions. They are after all an agreement to work together to attain a common goal - the CPC has a proven track record of marching to the beat of their own drummer regardless of the wishes of the majority of citizens represented through the majority of opposition MP's.
Maybe we should take to the streets while we still can.
Post a Comment