Samara is an
independent charitable organization, founded in 2008 to study citizen
engagement with Canadian democracy. Their work focuses on three
areas: political leadership; the participation of citizens in public
life; and public affairs journalism. They have conducted Canada's
first-ever systematic series of exit interviews with former Members
of Parliament in Canada and have released a series of reports that
use these collective narratives to shine light on how Parliament
works, and share MP’s advice on how our politics can be
improved.
These interviews were shared in a series of four reports that cover the MPs' backgrounds and paths to politics; their transition to public life and the ways they view their roles; how they describe their time in Parliament and their relationship with their political parties and their advice, recommendations and best practices. They have recently released their final report in this series.
These interviews were shared in a series of four reports that cover the MPs' backgrounds and paths to politics; their transition to public life and the ways they view their roles; how they describe their time in Parliament and their relationship with their political parties and their advice, recommendations and best practices. They have recently released their final report in this series.
These are the four
reports-
This report will
focus on the first part of those interviews, where the former
Parliamentarians discussed their motivations and paths to politics.
It sets the stage for a larger series of reports based on
the MP exit interviews. Our purpose is neither to applaud nor
embarrass MPs, but to understand political leadership and the role of
Parliamentarians in our system.
This report is the
second in a series sharing the stories and advice of these 65
Parliamentarians, each of whom dedicated an average of nearly ten and
a half years to national public life, acting as a bridge between
Canadians and their government.
The report outlines
how the MPs expressed embarrassment at the public displays of
politics in the House of Commons, saying that little constructive
work takes place there. Instead, the MPs said their most
important work was done away from the media spotlight, in the less
publicized venues of committees and caucus meeting.
Canadians know very
little about those men and women—leaders like our Members of
Parliament—and what they've learned serving on the front lines
of our democracy. MPs' experiences can offer tremendous insight into
the successes and failings of our democracy, and yet they're rarely
consulted about what should be done to improve our democratic
process,
Below you will find a
few 'teasers' from the final report, there are many surprises in
these extensive summaries of the MPs comments and I recommend that
anyone interested in our parliamentary system past, present or future
read each of the four reports.
'The first area
in which MPs focused their recommendations was the nomination
process, the point at which a political party, in each of Canada's
electoral ridings, chooses its candidate for the federal election.
Many of the MPs to whom we spoke, despite winning their nominations,
expressed discomfort or outright disgust with the way these decisions
were made and the lack of transparency and local engagement in the
process.
'Many
said they were left to their own devices to determine how to go about
their job, how to navigate the intricacies of parliamentary
procedure, and even how to hire appropriate staff. As one MP put it,
"Rookie MPs are, for all intents and purposes, abandoned the day
after they're elected. Unless you've established the right contacts
and you've got the ability to find your own way and ask questions, it
can be a pretty overpowering situation."
Another simply blamed the leadership of the
political parties and the culture of antagonism in the House. "It's
going to come from the leadership on top. I really would like to see
party leaders from all parties engage in sober debate, and not
throwing the malicious barbs back and forth," one MP
recommended.
'Several felt that
the Speaker should be more empowered to enforce good behaviour. "To
me the decorum should be simple. Run it like I did my Grade 8
classroom. Stop it and stop it now. You point at him and put the
cameras on [those] who are causing too much disturbance, then let the
people talk about it back home," said another MP.
'Many MPs claimed committees were where some
of Parliament's best work took place, where MPs could transcend the
inflated partisanship of Question Period and make policy
recommendations that best reflected the interests of the country as a
whole. As such, their recommendations centred on reducing political
party influence over the committee process, and putting in place
guidance to ensure committee work was better reflected in the
legislative process.
Specifically, a
number of MPs, including two party leaders, suggested reforming
committee regulations to weaken the ability of political party
leaders to replace MPs on committees mid-way through their mandate, a
tactic used to delay work from moving forward, or to stop it all
together.
Several MPs were
concerned that committee work didn't have enough influence over the
legislative process, and that committee reports were often shelved
without proper consideration. "Where committees have more power,
a lot more things are going to get done there," one MP said.
Another recommended that committee reports should be brought forward
as Parliamentary motions, to ensure greater profile and debate of the
work. "You spend all this time on committees. Surely there
should be some way to have motions on your recommendations. But there
isn't. There's just a minister who takes it and says, ‘Thanks
very much, we'll veto that. Goodbye,'" he said.
Given the recent
shelving of a number of reports from the Public Account Committee
the latter three points are particularly of interest! We also wonder
why these MPs all wait until they 'retire' before speaking out and if
the current lot will actually do anything to improve things. Not
holding my breath on that one!
Do visit
the Samara web site and support their work to
give us a better insight into how our democracy is working and how we
might improve it.
No comments:
Post a Comment