Regular readers will
know that I refuse to use the phrase that links OUR Government
directly with the leader of the Conservative party, preferring to use
the more accurate term when referring to that portion of government
coming under direct control of this dictatorial leader, that being
the 'Harper Regime'.
We must respect those thousands of government
worker who work for us in the Canadian Government and who are
forced to use that untenable phrase by directive of said regime, and
make no mistake despite all the denials the use of said phrase was
and is a directive of said leader and his personal (and ever
expanding) crew of mini dictators in the PMO. Thanks
to the The Canadian Press and their persistence if obtaining freedom
of information documents on this issue we can
now specifically say that when Dimitri Soudas, wrote to Canadian
newspapers asserting "no directive" went out to civil
servants to use the offending phrase and that "Nothing could be
further from the truth," he was lieing on behalf of the regimes
leader, Mr (you wont recognize this country) Harper.
The use of this heading
on press releases and other official documents is offensive enough
and according to “top former civil servants” “
breaches both communications policy and the civil service ethics
policy” but the so very obvious lieing and cover up once again
shows this regime up for exactly what it is.
All that said, we
cannot entirely blame the Harper Regime for the persistence of this
phrase, yes government employees have little choice but to follow
directives from above but the press, and indeed us bloggers, do NOT
have to legitimize this phrase by continually repeating it. Simply
substituting the single word 'government' or 'Harper' or 'the PMO'
where appropriate or, if you prefer as I do, 'The Harper Regime' and
refusing to publish anything with those inaccurate, self serving and
unethical words attached would quickly bring to an end such
'branding' of OUR government.
There has been much
written this week since the Canadian
Press broke this story, unfortunately they
almost all, in criticizing the use of the word “Harper”
in conjunction with the word “Government”, actually use
said phrase and thus increase its use and visibility, much I would
imagine to the delight of the Harper Regime!
This then is a call to
all reader of this blog to cease and desist using the phrase “The
(offensive word removed) Government” and to ask others who
publish on line and in print, and even broadcasters in radio and TV
to do the same. Its a small push back against this oligarchal regime
against whom we have so little recourse, but in my view it is a
meaningful one.
A t/h to Impolotical
for picking up on the Canadian Press piece on this and the many other
who followed suit but will you all please start using a more accurate
phrase when describing or alluding to the current 'government'.
re·gime/riˈZHēm/
- A government, esp. an authoritarian one.
- A system or planned way of doing things, esp. one imposed from above.
ol·i·gar·chy/ˈäliˌgärkē/
2. A state governed by
such a group
3 comments:
I could hardly bear to read this...just reading those words is offensive...but you nailed it...
but the more disturbing thought is that for sooooo many this is not a problem and for soooo many they buy into everything this regime says and does.
what is wrong with Canadians? How did this happen?
Can someone pinch me I don't like this dream anymore!
Just a quick suggestion. I understand that the tradition of 'blogging' is a long unstructured tirade.
But IF... you want more readership, then do what all good articles do - create a brief abstract/summary at the start. The reader then gets the main points in concise form and if interested, reads the whole blog, if not, still retains the underlying principles.
Again, just a suggestion not a criticism.
Kind regards
@Scott I thought I was keeping my posts quite concise however will keep your suggestion in mind. I am by no means a professional writer, just a concerned citizen doing his thing......
Post a Comment