It should then not be a surprise that
after commissioning a survey of 25,000 employers that cost
$4.6-million to shed light on the extent of the country’s skills
gap it was not published due to “ we have no funding for it, we’re
reviewing the data so that we can document how well the survey
worked”. Strange how the minister has been saying how there is a
skills shortage and how we must import forgiven workers to fill those
positions when they have not even fully analysed or publicized their
own survey on just that subject! Must not let the facts get in the
way of a good corporate scam eh!
In a similar mindset it seems that a
survey of the effectiveness the $15 million (2013) Economic
(In)action Plan advertising that was taken at a cost of $31,000 now
omits to ask whether those that saw them actually took any notice or
went to the web site. It would seem that when these questions were
asked in the past few even recalled seeing the ads and many of those
that did said the ads were a "waste of money" and
represented "propaganda," in an April 2012 survey. So
in typical Sargent Shultz fashion such questions are no longer asked.
They continue to spend millions on this questionable advertising
which provides no real information on their “plan” and thousands
on surveying the results without asking any questions which might
result in actual meaningful results.
Now I wonder why they are not
asking the public what it thinks of their (Un)fair Election Act? With
having been just slapped
down with their Senate Reform plans by
the courts you would think that they would at least make an effort to
get the FACTS of public opinion, but that is not in their DNA. After
stalling, withholding evidence and being generally “uncooperative”
with the robocall enquiry they have managed to bring it to a point
where 'not
enough evidence' can
be found to PROVE wrongdoing, they will now go full speed ahead to
make it even harder to prosecute those who participate in election
fraud. It will be interesting to see exactly what comes of the sudden
possible
acceptance of amendments
to their election act legislation. For the most part there is only
one group who has, and will continue to, try and cheat during an
election and its NOT the Electors.... but dont ask any questions eh!
1 comment:
It's as case of Ignorance is Strength, Rural.
Post a Comment