As I review the actions of the Harper Regime since coming to power
for my Harper History Series, an undertaking that one must take in
very small bites if one is to retain one composure and sanity, I have
been thinking a great deal about the choices before us and why we
support one lot over the others.
Whilst a great deal may rest
upon what each individual or party says they are going to do or has
done I am coming to the conclusion that TRUST may well be an
increasing part of the reason to vote for one or the other, and
mistrust of them all a big part of why an increasing number of folks
simply do not bother with it all!
Can we TRUST any of them to
actually do what they say they will? Clearly we cannot much of the
time, the current lot in particular is adept at telling us they are
doing one thing and actual doing the exact oppose. They tell us, and
their colleagues, that a piece of legislation will make our elections
fairer with better oversight for instance when in fact it it does
neither of those things. All to often those promised things that they
can do without legislative changes are put off for years, even till
after the next election when they may not even be in a position to do
it. Unless such things increase their control or decrease access to
information of course!
Can we TRUST an individual or party
when they say “If you vote for us we will.....” . NO, for one
thing this kind of statement is completely false as it relates to
proposed legislation as such changes must be put before parliament
and only if passed will become fact. Of course if, as is the current
case, you have a majority in both the House and the Senate and are
prepared to ignore any opposition, cut off debate, and force your MPs
to vote as you dictate then perhaps you can say this. But see the
previous item on that score!
Can we TRUST any of them to tell
the truth when they are caught bending the rules, caught with their
hands in the public purse, lieing about their involvement in election
fraud or any number of thing that may reflect badly on them.
Obviously NO. Our present PM in particular, who is clearly the most
controlling PM in our history with a office full of hit men who do
nothing without his say so, suddenly turns into Sgt 'I no nothing'
Shultz when such things surface.
Can we TRUST them to follow
the rules and respect parliamentary conventions. Depends upon if its
politically expedient to do so, clearly the current regime has NO
compunction in ignoring such things when it suits them, but rigidly
enforces them when the opposition crosses the line.
Can we
TRUST them to work cooperatively for the betterment of Canada.
Clearly NOT, work for the betterment of themselves and their
corporate friends, yes. Keep their seat warm until their gold plated
pension kicks in, you bet.
Can we TRUST them to negotiate
trade deals with foreign nations that do not severely restrict
municipalities and government ability to choose to use local goods
and services and to ban substances and practices we deem harmful. Too
late, its already a done deal with China and others and is in the
works with Europe.
Can we TRUST them to allow those whom we
elect at a local level, who may be that rare animal 'an honest and
ethical MP' to speak his or her mind and express the needs and wants
of his constituents when it does not match the policies of the party
with which he is a member of. NO, they will be tossed from the caucus
if they dare to openly criticize a policy or vote against a piece of
key legislation. With a few notable exceptions NOT a chance.
Non
of the preceding means that there are not many trustworthy MPs but
how many of them can we TRUST to not just spout the talking points
fed to them by the party hierarchy when speaking publicly or to their
constituents.
In short it is the lack of TRUST that leaves us all
wondering who the hell we are going to vote for in order to rid
ourselves of the most lieing, cheating, unethical, anti democratic,
dictatorial regime in Canadian history. For me in this riding, where
the majority of folks have blindly voted conservative for years, the
choice is between the up and coming Greens who have little chance of
securing this seat and one of the other opposition candidates who
have a greater, but still low, chance of toppling the existing Con
MP.
I TRUST that the choice will become clearer as we get
closer to the election, but I doubt it!
Support Democracy - Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
A blog to give a voice to our concern about the continued erosion of our democratic processes not only within the House of Commons and within our electoral system but also throughout our society. Here you will find articles about the current problems within our parliamentary democracy, about actions both good and bad by our elected representatives, about possible solutions, opinions and debate about the state of democracy in Canada, and about our roles/responsibilities as democratic citizens. We invite your thoughtful and polite comments upon our posts and ask those who wish to post longer articles or share ideas on this subject to submit them for inclusion as a guest post.
Contact us at democracyunderfire@gmail.com
Contact us at democracyunderfire@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Democracy can't work without a modicum of trust, Rural.
Parliamentary democracy was built on trust. We have conventions. But little has been codified. If we lose that trust, we lose our democracy.
That is true Owen. I just know after that after all these recent years of our 'Trust in government' being destroyed it is going to be very hard for ANY government to build back trust by the public in our parliamentary system.
Post a Comment