Although Minister Maryam Monsef has nothing
about the makeup or members of the Electoral Reform Committee on the
Democratic
Institutions web site it seems that the MPs to serve on this
important committee have been named. according
to the CBC they are :-
Conservatives: Jason Kenney, Scott Reid and Gérard Deltell
Liberals: John Aldag, Matt DeCourcey, Sherry Romanado, Ruby Sahota
and Francis Scarpaleggia
NDP; Nathan Cullen and Alexandre Boulerice
Bloc Québecois: Luc Thériault
Greens: Elizabeth May.
“The committee will elect its chair on Tuesday and is
expected to hold hearings through the summer. The next few months
will also include what is being described as "a series of
national outreach engagements" with the minister of democratic
institutions, Maryam Monsef, and her parliamentary secretary, Mark
Holland.”
I presume the committee will have its own web site and that
citizens will be able to submit their views directly to the committee
in the very near future. I do hope they will be more forth coming
than what appears to be a lack of communications from the Minister and her
staff who at this time do not even have a direct contact email on
their web page but mail must go through the PCO?
I am rooting for Ms May as chair but its liable to be one of the liberals!
Note: The committee elected Francis Scarpaleggia as chair and
Nathan Cullen and Scott Reid as vice chairs.
UPDATE
A reader has provided a link to the Committee Web Site, it is :-
http://www.parl.gc.ca/Committees/en/ERRE
Contact them at ERRE@parl.gc.ca
UPDATE #2
The Mandate of the Committee
Pursuant to Standing Order 81(16), the House proceeded to the putting of
the question on the main motion, as amended, of Mr. Cullen
(Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), —
That a Special Committee on electoral reform be appointed to identify
and conduct a study of viable alternate voting systems to replace the
first-past-the-post system, as well as to examine mandatory voting and
online voting, and to assess the extent to which the options identified
could advance the following principles for electoral reform:
1) Effectiveness and legitimacy: that the proposed measure would
increase public confidence among Canadians that their democratic will,
as expressed by their votes, will be fairly translated and that the
proposed measure reduces distortion and strengthens the link between
voter intention and the election of representatives;
2) Engagement: that the proposed measure would encourage voting
and participation in the democratic process, foster greater civility and
collaboration in politics, enhance social cohesion and offer
opportunities for inclusion of underrepresented groups in the political
process;
3) Accessibility and inclusiveness: that the proposed measure would
avoid undue complexity in the voting process, while respecting the other
principles, and that it would support access by all eligible voters
regardless of physical or social condition;
4) Integrity: that the proposed measure can be implemented while
safeguarding public trust in the election process, by ensuring reliable
and verifiable results obtained through an effective and objective
process that is secure and preserves vote secrecy for individual
Canadians;
5) Local representation: that the proposed measure would ensure
accountability and recognize the value that Canadians attach to
community, to Members of Parliament understanding local conditions and
advancing local needs at the national level, and to having access to
Members of Parliament to facilitate resolution of their concerns and
participation in the democratic process;
that the Committee be directed to issue an invitation to each Member of
Parliament to conduct a town hall in their respective constituencies and
provide the Committee with a written report of the input from their
constituents to be filed with the Clerk of the Committee no later than
October 14, 2016;
that the Committee be directed to take into account the applicable
constitutional, legal and implementation parameters in the development
of its recommendations; accordingly, the Committee should seek out
expert testimony on these matters;
that the Committee be directed to consult broadly with relevant experts
and organizations, take into consideration consultations that have been
undertaken on the issue, examine relevant research studies and
literature, and review models being used or developed in other
jurisdictions;
that the Committee be directed to develop its consultation agenda,
working methods, and recommendations on electoral reform with the goal
of strengthening the inclusion of all Canadians in our diverse society,
including women, Indigenous Peoples, youth, seniors, Canadians with
disabilities, new Canadians, and residents of rural and remote
communities;
that the Committee be directed to conduct a national engagement process
that includes a comprehensive and inclusive consultation with Canadians,
including through written submissions and online engagement tools;
that the Committee be directed to study and advise on additional methods for obtaining the views of Canadians;
that the Committee be composed of twelve (12) members of which
five (5) shall be government members, three (3) shall be from the
Official Opposition, two (2) shall be from the New Democratic Party, one
(1) member shall be from the Bloc Québécois, and the Member for
Saanich—Gulf Islands;
that changes in the membership of the Committee be effective immediately
after notification by the Whip has been filed with the Clerk of the
House;
that membership substitutions be permitted, if required, in the manner provided for in Standing Order 114(2);
that, with the exception of the Member for Saanich—Gulf Islands,
all other members shall be named by their respective Whip by depositing
with the Clerk of the House the list of their members to serve on the
Committee no later than ten (10) sitting days following the adoption of
this motion;
that the Committee be chaired by a member of the government party; that,
in addition to the Chair, there be one (1) Vice-Chair from the Official
Opposition and one (1) Vice-Chair from the New Democratic Party, and
that all candidates for the position of Chair or Vice-Chair shall be
elected by secret ballot, and that each candidate be permitted to
address the Committee for not more than three (3) minutes;
that the quorum of the Committee be as provided for in Standing Order
118, provided that at least four (4) members are present and provided
that one (1) member from the government party and one (1) member from an
opposition party are present;
that the Committee be granted all of the powers of a standing committee,
as provided in the Standing Orders, as well as the power to travel,
accompanied by the necessary staff, inside and outside of Canada;
that the Committee have the power to authorize video and audio broadcasting of any or all of its proceedings; and
that the Committee present its final report no later than December 1, 2016.
Support Democracy - Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
A blog to give a voice to our concern about the continued erosion of our democratic processes not only within the House of Commons and within our electoral system but also throughout our society. Here you will find articles about the current problems within our parliamentary democracy, about actions both good and bad by our elected representatives, about possible solutions, opinions and debate about the state of democracy in Canada, and about our roles/responsibilities as democratic citizens. We invite your thoughtful and polite comments upon our posts and ask those who wish to post longer articles or share ideas on this subject to submit them for inclusion as a guest post.
Contact us at democracyunderfire@gmail.com
Contact us at democracyunderfire@gmail.com
Tuesday, June 21, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Let's hope they solicit wide spread public engagement, Rural.
Let us hope that they use all means to do so, Owen
Here is the committee homepage:
http://www.parl.gc.ca/Committees/en/ERRE
I believe you can make submissions to the committee's email address and it will be translated and added to the official records.
Thanks for that 'doconnor', I have updated the post to include that information.
Well, we had a parliamentary committee on assisted dying, and the bill C-14 reflected so few of its recommendations, it was a joke. At least Oliphant, the Liberal leader of the committee, voted against it.
Were I not such a sceptic, I'd say this new committee is just there to flap their gums virtuously, engage citizens to give evidence who actually believe they are making a difference, and then after the final report, the government just gets an intern lawyer over at MoJ to write up a bill to reflect what they wanted all along. Just like C-14.
Anyone want to bet?
BM
BM, after 10 years of shall we say "less than cooperative government" its hard to stay optimistic as to parliament working as it should, but I do see an effort to make things work better, Whether such signs lead to a more permanent 'attitude adjustment' in the House and government remains to be seen!
Post a Comment