“While it’s well worth perusing the full document when/if you have time, here’s a quick overview of the chief electoral officer’s most (seemingly) commonsensical recommendations, several of which, it’s worth noting, can also be found in Team Trudeau’s 2015 campaign platform, but have thus far failed to materialize in the House in legislative form:
- Reverse the ban on using the Voter Information Card as as
identification at the polls and loosen the new restrictions on
attesting for electors without sufficient ID that were brought in
under the Fair Elections Act.
- Re-empower the chief electoral officer to launch public
outreach and education programs, including those that specifically
target “persons and groups most likely to experience difficulties
in exercising their democratic rights,” as well as groups with a
lower rate of voter registration than the general population.
- Give the Commissioner of Elections the power to compel
testimony – a recommendation that, the report notes, was first
made in 2013 – as well as the authority to lay charges without the
go-ahead from the director of public prosecutions.
- Set a maximum length for an election period – the CEO
suggests “45 or 50 days, for example,” and “consider” adding
a new provision specifying that the writ be issued on September 1.
- Look at switching from a weekday to a weekend polling day,
which would allow the vote to take place on Saturday or Sunday
- Give the agency the power to impose fines – or
“administrative monetary penalties” – for certain violations
of the rules – specifically, those relating to financing and
communications – rather than rely on criminal sanctions
- Give Elections Canada the authority to initiate
“pre-registration” campaigns targeting 16 and 17 year olds “with
a view to eventually including them” in the permanent electors
list, as well as verify citizenship status of potential electors
with the citizenship and immigration department.
- Allow in-home and “curbside” voting for those who are
unable to vote at their assigned polling station, whether due to
mobility challenges or any other mental or physical disability that
restricts their ability to enter a polling station (like, for
instance, extreme scent sensitivity).
Support Democracy - Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
4 comments:
They sound like reasonable suggestions, Rural. And they would essentially reverse the Fair Elections Act.
But will anyone in government adopt these ideas is the question Owen.
I especially like the idea of pre-registering 16 and 17-year-olds, Rural. The future health of our democracy rests in their hands, and could certainly revitalize the way civics is taught in high school.
It is important that our youth understand the importance of selecting our 'representatives' no matter how it turns out we do so, Lorne
Post a Comment