A group of activists called on the Ontario
government to ban the practice of stationing uniformed police
officers at high schools across the province after the Toronto
District School Board (TDSB) voted
to permanently end the program...... TDSB staff released a
report recommending the elimination of the program because it left
some students feeling intimidated or uncomfortable.
So because a few students
feel intimidated by police presence this outreach by the police is
'banned'!
The School Resource Officer program, which the
TDSB suspended at the end of August, saw police officers deployed at
45 of its high schools in an effort to improve safety and perceptions
of police. ........ the majority of those surveyed had a generally
positive impression. However, it noted, about 10 per cent felt
intimidated, uncomfortable or that they were being watched at school.
Whilst a majority of the
students had a positive view of the program the 10 or 15% who did not
(supported by a few vocal anti police acctivists) diminish the work
done by these officers to improve the relationship between kids and
police in these schools.
Rodney Diverlus, a member of Black Lives Matter,
said there are better supports for students than having officers in
schools.
“We believe the removal of the program puts an
emphasis on the Ministry of Education to actually give adequate
funding to the TDSB and other boards to support in having child and
youth workers, equity-based social workers, more guidance counsellors
and more time for teachers and teaching staff,” Diverlus said. “A
wide range of educators and community-based workers would better
support students, student safety and student achievement.”
One cannot disagree that
some schools need more resources to guide and support 'troubled'
students however to remove the officers from these schools without a
viable alternative in place is a step backwards. The idea that school
boards already pressed for funds will provide such extra resources in
the forseeable future is dreaming in tecniclouur
Toronto Police Association president Mike
McCormack, however, said the board’s decision did not come as a
surprise, adding that he thinks it was politically motivated.
“I think there is a lot of value in the program
and now that value has been squandered or lost,” “here’s an
opportunity to look at that 10 per cent and say, ‘Why do you have
these perceptions?’” “For me, someone who has worked in
community-based policing, this is the type of group where you want
... to understand what’s going on and you want to improve the
relationship,” “For me, someone who has worked in community-based
policing, this is the type of group where you want ... to understand
what’s going on and you want to improve the relationship,”
McCormack said.
Indeed this program appeared to have a positive impact with many kids and seemed to
improve the relationship between law enforcement and the youth
involved for the most part. Its a shame that a greater effort was not
made to address the concerns of the vocal few that did not see it
that way without the discontinuation of this attempt to improve the
interaction between students and police.
Support Democracy - Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
A blog to give a voice to our concern about the continued erosion of our democratic processes not only within the House of Commons and within our electoral system but also throughout our society. Here you will find articles about the current problems within our parliamentary democracy, about actions both good and bad by our elected representatives, about possible solutions, opinions and debate about the state of democracy in Canada, and about our roles/responsibilities as democratic citizens. We invite your thoughtful and polite comments upon our posts and ask those who wish to post longer articles or share ideas on this subject to submit them for inclusion as a guest post.
Contact us at democracyunderfire@gmail.com
Contact us at democracyunderfire@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment