In this era of hyper-partisanship, can
backbenchers have an effective voice, or have they been relegated to
the role of a modern Greek chorus, anonymous figures advancing a
pre-determined story?
This is the question Hershell
Ezrin asks in a short article in Ontario News Watch
“In defence of hyper partisanship,
central party staff at federal and provincial levels monitor
backbenchers’ social media output regularly. Faux loyalty moments
like standing ovations have become “de rigueur” in Question
Period. “Cheerleading” records are kept. Caucus meetings seem
more devoted to unquestioning displays of loyalty than to serious
confidential discussion and feedback sessions..........
Current political staff have been
accused of being the disciplinarians for this alternate reality. To
get ahead (trips, assignments and even promotion), backbenchers need
to satisfy the enforcers that they are good team players. “
This discussion was of course
brought on by the recent disagreement between a rookie MPP and her
rookie leader in the Ontario legislature.
In a letter to the Speaker of the legislature, Amanda Simard said her decision was effective immediately, and she will remain as an independent. New Democrats and Liberals said they were not aware of any efforts to recruit her to their ranks.
"I am no longer a member of the Progressive Conservative Caucus," Simard wrote in the short letter. "I will continue to take my place in the Legislative Assembly of Ontario as an Independent.
The
rookie legislator, who represents a largely Franco-Ontarian riding,
broke ranks with Premier Doug Ford's government over the two
controversial decisions affecting about 600,000 francophones in the
province.”
It
has also highlighted the amount of 'control' that the Ford Regime
wishes to have over the entire legislative process...
“The
Progressive Conservatives fear some disgruntled MPPs are set to cross
the floor to join the Liberals, the Star has learned. That’s a key
reason why Premier Doug
Ford is increasing the threshold for official party status in the
legislature from eight MPPs to 12, a senior source says. Ford’s
office closely monitors Tory members. Sources say they track who
applauds in the legislature and watch for MPPs who do not quickly
leap to their feet for ovations after the premier or ministers
respond to opposition inquiries during question period.
“They keep tabs on everything,” said a fourth Tory .... Two party aides noted that speaking out in caucus meetings is also discouraged because they don’t want anyone to undermine team unity.
“They keep tabs on everything,” said a fourth Tory .... Two party aides noted that speaking out in caucus meetings is also discouraged because they don’t want anyone to undermine team unity.
But
is all of the above Premier Doug
Ford‘s decision or that of his chief of staff Dean French who
it is alleged effectively
runs the caucus meetings and just about everything else in Fords
government? French’s management style has been called into question
by members of his own party and by the opposition.
Who
is running the ship and where is it going, perhaps Ford is also just decoration?
4 comments:
Given what you describe here, Rural, it appears we have our own form of gerrymandering in Ontario.
I suspect we are just seeing the thin end of the wedge Lorne!
There's nothing like "free and open debate" is there, Rural?
It seems to be increasingly MIA in our parliamentary system Owen!
Post a Comment