After 75 years of life learning on this planet we call Earth the last 40 or so with a computer of one kind or another on my desk, almost 20 of those with the ability to share my thoughts on that newfangled thing call the 'internet', I thought it was time to take stock of my life. I suspect that given the necessary reduction of interaction with others outside of close family over the last year or more that many folks much younger than I are rethinking their place in this world.
Some folks who have deeply religious or political convictions may have retreated into those polarizing beliefs, certainly many of our neighbors south of the border seem to be heading in that direction and demonstrating the danger of not thinking for ones self and following the herd. Personally I have never had strong political or religious beliefs except to think that perhaps a blind belief in either one (or both) may do more harm than good. This is not to say that we do not need a stable governing system and our democratic one is IMHO about the best, but when it becomes too polarised and confrontational it defeats its purpose.
Much the same can be said of religion, although I can hardly speak authoritatively about it only recently having found that there is a definition of my 'beliefs' (or lack thereof), not that I am much for 'labels' the following sums up my thoughts fairly accurately
Humanists believe that human experience and rational thinking provide the only source of both knowledge and a moral code to live by, they reject the idea of knowledge 'revealed' to human beings by gods.
Humanism is a democratic and ethical life stance, which affirms that human beings have the right and responsibility to give meaning and shape to their own lives. It stands for the building of a more humane society through an ethic based on human and other natural values in the spirit of reason and free inquiry through human capabilities.
Most humanists would agree with the ideas below:
There are no supernatural beings.
The material universe is the only thing that exists.
Science provides the only reliable source of knowledge about this universe.
We only live this life - there is no after-life, and no such thing as reincarnation.
Human beings can live ethical and fulfilling lives without religious beliefs.
Human beings derive their moral code from the lessons of history, personal experience, and thought.
Humanists reject the idea or belief in a supernatural being such as God. This means that humanists class themselves as agnostic or atheist. Humanists have no belief in an afterlife, and so they focus on seeking happiness in this life.
Apparently I may be an atheist but not an agnostic (damn labels again eh).......
An atheist doesn't believe in a god or divine being. ... However, an agnostic neither believes nor disbelieves in a god or religious doctrine. Agnostics assert that it's impossible for human beings to know anything about how the universe was created and whether or not divine beings exist.
I am not sure about that last bit for we learn more and more about the universe around us as our scientific and technical ability evolves, will we ever know all there is to know ...not a chance, but lets keep looking and sharing our finds with all of mankind. I don't know about 'divine beings' whatever the definition of those are, but I am totally convinced that other intelligent beings exist in the universe both less evolved than us and much greater. The question remains whether we manage to evolve much more before we destroy the ability of our world to support the life that developed from space dust over millions of years. Intelligent human beings, there are days when I start to wonder!
What may you ask brought on this introspective, my small handful of regular readers will know I have had very little to say on these pages in the past year or so, its not that I have nothing to say, for even if our situation federally is reasonably stable (for just a short while longer by the look of things) there is more than enough disasters building provincially in various governments across our country to comment upon. Its more that as I gradually move into my dotage I find that my mind outruns my ability to get my thoughts down on paper (actually on computer, my expressions are as old as my body) before have forgotten what I was going to say. I suspect this happens to most 'old' folks sooner or later and we know that for some folk it deteriorates into a total loss of memory and thinking skills, I sure hope I am not headed there and don't think I am but am acutely aware that I am not as 'sharp' as I was 5 years ago. I am sure my major stroke back then, from which I had 'a miraculous recovery' over the following year, has quite a bit to do with both my current thinking and what I view as my gradual inability to 'find' the right words at times.
I will leave you with this thought which sums things up quite nicely......
There are known
knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are
known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do
not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t
know we don’t know.
Donald
Rumsfeld:
Support Democracy - Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
6 comments:
Nice to see your post after a long absence, Rural. Personally, I think one of the best protections against cognitive decline (something we all fear) is to keep expressing oneself in writing, especially when the spirit moves them. It may not always be easy to articulate one's thoughts, but in my view, it is well-worth the effort.
I will keep trying once in a while Lorne when as you say 'the spirit moves me'!
I suppose I am agnostic, Rural. It's hard to believe that homo sapiens are the top of the hill. Just because we haven't found anything superior on the remainder of the billiard balls that make up our solar system is irrelevant.
My father was a freemason, top order whatever. He persisted in trying to get me to join. The only qualification, apparently, was a belief in a "higher power." If, as some suggest, life on Earth is some alien's science project that would presumably be a higher order. Just because that and a million other explanations are possible, that stops well short of belief. "Belief" is where we get fouled up, every time.
And the Rumsfeld quote is a great closer.
Yep..... and I truly believe that I don't know what I don't know LOL
Sigh.... interesting article, but I wish this "don't know that you don't know" comment wasn't always being attributed to Donald Rumsfeld. I learned it in the mid-'80s at some human-potential courses where it was always being touted, and at that time it was attributed to multitudinous others from NASA administrators to Henry Gantt. for sure there's no reason to attribute anything but violent war to Rumsfeld.
Yet one more thing I did not Know......
Post a Comment