But for John
Ibbitson's bit in the G&M the demise of the bill
to bring just a little more proportional representation to our
Canadian parliament would probably gone unnoticed. It seems that ALL
our representatives in the HoC, or a least all their party bosses,
have decided quietly amongst themselves that bill C12, a bill to
bring the number of MPs more closely aligned with population growth
will be shelved.
To quote Ibbison
“Sources report that the Conservative, Liberal and NDP
leadership encountered strong resistance to the bill among Quebec and
Maritime MPs, who correctly argued that their regions would have
relatively less influence in the House. The Bloc Québécois
opposed the legislation from the start.
The Liberals and
Conservatives especially feared that passing the bill could harm the
electoral prospects of their Quebec MPs. Facing caucus revolts and
potential electoral losses, the government shelved the bill.”
In other words who
gives a shit about democracy or fair representation when we (the
party) may loose a few seats in an already over represented area.
What chance then of getting ANY support for the far wider electoral
reform that is sorely needed in this country, those now in power
along with those who think they may have a chance to regain power
will fight tooth and nail to retain the status quo because it serves
THEIR interest. When will these folks who are supposed to be
representing the best interests of their Constituents and OUR Country
start putting those interests before self and Party? Not until they
are forced to I suspect.
The imbalance is
highlighted by Ibbitson by pointing out some numbers from the recent
by-election - “The need for the bill was manifest in
Monday’s by-elections. In the exurban Toronto riding of
Vaughan, 120,864 voters were entitled to cast ballots. But Winnipeg
North has only 51,198 electors, making a vote in Greater Toronto
worth less than half the value of a vote in Winnipeg.”
Even worse are these
numbers from StageLeft -
“Liberal MP
Kevin Lamoureux will take his seat in parliament to represent the
riding of Winnipeg North after collecting 7,303 of a possible 51,198
votes - that's 14.26% of the electorate.
Conservative MP Julian Fantino will take his seat in Parliament to represent the riding of Vaughan after collecting 19,260 of a possible 120,864 votes - that's 15.94% of the electorate.
Conservative MP Robert Sopuk will take his seat in Parliament to represent the riding of Dauphin--Swan River--Marquette after collecting 8,176 of a possible 53,549 votes - that's 15.27% of the electorate. “
Conservative MP Julian Fantino will take his seat in Parliament to represent the riding of Vaughan after collecting 19,260 of a possible 120,864 votes - that's 15.94% of the electorate.
Conservative MP Robert Sopuk will take his seat in Parliament to represent the riding of Dauphin--Swan River--Marquette after collecting 8,176 of a possible 53,549 votes - that's 15.27% of the electorate. “
No matter which side of
the equation these MPs are on it would seem that they can hardly say
that they have the support of their constituents or indeed truly
represent the riding from which they come. True, the turn out was
pathetic, not that such apathy is uncommon in by-elections, or for
that matter general elections. If the question was asked “why
do you not vote” I suspect many respondents would say “Because
my vote makes no difference, even if the person I vote for wins the
'party' will dictate how he votes anyway, so why bother”!
I maintain (despite
that I am one of those minorities whose vote will have less clout
should proportional representation ever take hold, a rural resident)
that representation that more closely follows the actual wishes of
our citizens can do nothing but improve the way in which our
democracy works. I will mean a broader range of views will actually
see the light of day in parliament, it will mean less of a monopoly
of power by the long established partys, it will mean more citizens
will feel they have greater control over who gets elected and may
even wrest a little power back from those Political Partys who think
their way is the highway and everyone else is to be ignored.
Returning to the
killing of Bill C12, its not all bad. In these times of fiscal
restraint the addition of 30 new MPs would cost
us a minimum of 18 to 20 Million a year if we include
salaries, pensions, office budgets, allowances and services provided
by the House. Its hard to gain any perspective when our government
proposes to spend millions on fighter jets designed for war when our
search and rescue folks still do not have new helicopters and our
navy still does not have any heavy ice breakers to patrol our
northern waters. When
our prime minister and his ministers have increased their own
spending by 16.5%, when Harper's office expenses ballooned to
$9,894,370 (Yes, thats almost 10 MILLION in “office expenses”)
in 2009, when the Conservative government spent $100 million on
polling over the past five years.
It seems to me it is
not MORE MPs we need, but BETTER MPs working for the betterment of
our citizens rater than the “Party”, representing a more
evenly distributed number of citizens and elected in a more
representative way!
1 comment:
Well, it may've just been a trial balloon that was retracted, because the word the very next day was that the Cons. are going to bring this leg. forward after all.
www.cbc.ca/politics/insidepolitics/2010/12/infoalertebotwatch-reports-of-the-death-of-c-12-greatly-exaggerated.html
And re: the concern about the cost -- that might be unfair to the people _in_ the under-represented ridings... you're probably overlooking the value of all the REAL work the MPs (or at least their offices) do at the constituency level, sorting out immigration & VISA & EI problems etc., which are 'way more prevalent in those large underrepresented ridings. I.e., the smaller & rural ridings are not only getting twice as much Parliamentary rep. for their (non-)votes, but twice as much access to or twice as speedy results on their indiv. constituent's concerns, where the fast growing riding are getting ripped off.
Post a Comment