This week I will let a few other
commentators speak to the condition of our democracy and the Harper
regimes ongoing disdain for opposing views, parliamentary process,
the taxpayers, and that promised open and accountable thing!.
First up Rick
Mercer regarding the probability of yet another Omnibus budget bill
on its way:-
“One of the most elegant pleas
ever made against omnibus bills was made not that long ago in the
House of Commons by a handsome young man by the name of Stephen
Harper. He said it, omnibus bills are anti-democratic, they’re a
slap in the face to MPs and voters.
See, this fascinates me. Because it's one thing if you don't know any better, but he clearly does, he just doesn't care. Who does that? I wouldn’t want to spend five minutes in that guy’s head for all the money in the world. Because he knows right from wrong here, he's on record, but he has decided it's okay to do wrong in order to advance the right. And democracy no longer enters into it.”
See, this fascinates me. Because it's one thing if you don't know any better, but he clearly does, he just doesn't care. Who does that? I wouldn’t want to spend five minutes in that guy’s head for all the money in the world. Because he knows right from wrong here, he's on record, but he has decided it's okay to do wrong in order to advance the right. And democracy no longer enters into it.”
Next Elizabeth
May on the Chinese take over of part of the oil patch
and the 'investor protection' that may be part of the recently signed
trade agreement yet to be made public. Any guesses which way this one
is going to go......
“I want greater ties with China
for environmental endeavors, and cultural exchanges, and — yes –
trade too. Losing sovereignty to China makes me nervous. I don’t
want to be intolerant. But I want us to trade items made in Canada,
by Canadians, to China. I don’t like the idea of China owning
Canada. It makes it hard for us to point out to the Chinese
government that it must start respecting human rights. We need to be
really forceful in advocating for religious and political freedom in
China. How do we do that when they have veto power over Canadian
laws?”
An
American comments upon the 47% remarks by Romney
but the same holds true here with Harper 'negotiating' several 'free'
trade agreements behind closed doors as I write:-
“You often hear that
competition due to "globalization" means that we have to
accept lower wages and fewer benefits, because people "over
there" make so much less. What has caused the pressure, however,
is "free trade" agreements that allow companies here to
close factories here and open them over there, and then bring the
same things they used to make here to sell in the same stores. The
only "trade" involved in this transaction is trading who
does the work.”
A Canadian piece about how
the Harper regimen changes their tune to suit
the politically inspired attack message of the day, particularly if
it suits their do nothing environmental policies.......
In 2008, the Conservative
platform promised to “develop and implement a North American-wide
cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases and air pollution, with
implementation to occur between 2012 and 2015.” Now, however, the
Conservative attack machine denounces a cap-and-trade system, as
conceptually proposed by the NDP, as a “carbon tax,” a job killer
“that will increase the price on everything.”
And then of course there is the ongoing
efforts by the “government” to NOT
get to the bottom of the Election robocall mess.
“Steven Shrybman on behalf of
the applicants makes the point that the same Conservatives who are
demanding his clients put up a large security deposit against costs
are the ones who are driving costs up by filing so many motions. “
(and delaying the ruling by doing so)
For more history on this one check
out my Election Malfeasance page above.
Regarding the latest spin from the
Harperites Tim
Harper of the Star opines:-
“Never missing an opportunity
to inject cynicism into the body politic, the Conservatives will
place the MPs’ pension matter in another
omnibus bill, serving their purposes on two fronts.
By stuffing it into a bill that will run hundreds of pages
and include a litany of measures the opposition will not support,
they hope to score cheap points with reports that Liberals and New
Democrats opposed the pension reform.”
I very much doubt if he is wrong on
that. But
wait there is more, we could not have the
current lot pay any more into their pension plan or loose some
benefits now could we...
To enlist the support of Conservative MPs, the new plan is expected to be phased in, meaning today’s MPs will not lose any of the future pay-outs that have accrued so far.
But over the next five years, the government will do away with the current arrangement that sees MPs contribute only a fraction of their pension savings, with taxpayers picking up the rest. “
There is much more but that’s about
all my stomach can stand for today!
1 comment:
I hear you. I too despair at what Canada has become. Everyday a new policy dragging us in the wrong direction and further untethering Canadians from reason.
Post a Comment