The
Senate has just voted for a major shake-up of how members of the
Red Chamber align themselves by allowing nine or more members
to form a caucus, a substantial break from tradition that
has historically seen the place organized along party lines.
A small but important step forward in my view, I continue to
believe that we need this body to examine and offer revisions upon
legislation proposed by the government (particularly majority
governments) and any move to give more resources to “independents”
and move away from partisan decisions is a good thing IMHO.
The motion directs the Senate rules committee to now
formalize the changes, and then requests the
internal economy committee — which effectively
governs the chamber and adjudicates complaints — to draw-up
budgets for these prospective new caucuses, to help hire staff
for "secretariats" and pursue research projects. The motion
was adopted by a voice vote, so it is not clear how much support it
had from the existing parties.
Now if only “independent” and minority caucus's in the House
of Commons could get equal access to resources for their MP's
Because he faced a significant list of vacancies when he
assumed office, Trudeau has been able to appoint a large number of
new senators in a relatively short time through a "merit-based"
application process. In the last year alone, 27 senators have been
appointed and a further 11 senators will be appointed by the year's
end (or 38 out of a total 105 senators).
Virtually all of these new appointees have joined together
with a handful of other senators — who left the Liberal or
Conservative caucuses for various reasons — to create the
Independent Senators Group (ISG) led by Alberta Senator Elaine McCoy,
who acts as its leader or "convenor." (The caucus
definition change also formally brings the ISG under the
Senate's rules.)
I note that Senator Elaine McCoy has been a self identified
“independent” for many years, long before Trudeau started
appointing “non partisan” senators.
Wells said while the new senators were appointed as
Independents, they have since realized it is beneficial to caucus
together to share money, staff and other resources.
I really hope this does not encourage the groups to morf into
partisan voting blocks but simply encourages independent thinkers to
cooperate and find consensus on matters of particular interest to
them.
Support Democracy - Recommend this Post at Progressive Bloggers
A blog to give a voice to our concern about the continued erosion of our democratic processes not only within the House of Commons and within our electoral system but also throughout our society. Here you will find articles about the current problems within our parliamentary democracy, about actions both good and bad by our elected representatives, about possible solutions, opinions and debate about the state of democracy in Canada, and about our roles/responsibilities as democratic citizens. We invite your thoughtful and polite comments upon our posts and ask those who wish to post longer articles or share ideas on this subject to submit them for inclusion as a guest post.
Contact us at democracyunderfire@gmail.com
Contact us at democracyunderfire@gmail.com
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
A step in the right direction, Rural.
I think so Owen
Post a Comment